Tuesday 12 June 2018, Taunusanlage 11, 60329 Frankfurt am Main

E-mail Tel: +44 203 780 4137

Chairs

Daniel Busse

Allen & Overy

Stephan Wilske

Gleiss Lutz

Susanne Gropp-Stadler

Head of Litigation, Siemens

Speakers

Diana Akikol

ABR Avocats

Markus Burianski

White & Case

Nadia Darwazeh

Clyde & Co

Alexander Fessas

Secretary General, ICC Court and Director of ICC Dispute Resolution Services, International Chamber of Commerce

Beata Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz

GESSEL

Richard Happ

Luther

Daniel Hochstrasser

Bär & Karrer

Nikolas Hübschen

Senior Vice President General Law & Litigation, Legal & Compliance, Uniper

Jasmin Kaboni-Voit

Senior Legal Counsel, RWE Supply & Trading

Christian Konrad

Konrad & Partners

James Menz

Deputy Secretary General and Head of Case Management, German Arbitration Institute (DIS)

Jan Erik Spangenberg

Manner Spangenberg

Johanna Wirth

Hengeler Mueller

Mathias Wittinghofer

Herbert Smith Freehills

Programme

9.00: Welcome coffee and registration

9.30: Chairs' opening remarks

Daniel Busse, Allen & Overy
Stephan Wilske, Gleiss Lutz
Susanne Gropp-Stadler, Head of Litigation, Siemens

9.45: Session one: The new DIS rules – is the revision courageous enough?

The DIS rules 2018 have adapted and added to German arbitration rules in a way which was intended to reflect the changes and developments of IA. But do the additions go far enough, and are the changes bold enough to move the needle on how the DIS is viewed? Should it have done more to be a leader? Among other things, the panel are expected to – controversely – discuss questions such as:

  • Is “from Ad-hoc plus to ICC light” a fair description?
  • What is missing?
  • Are the revisions innovative, or aping the norm?
  • Are they international enough, or a little too ‘German’?
  • Will the rules improve efficiency, or will we see no drastic change? 

Moderator:
Stephan Wilske, Gleiss Lutz

Panel:
James Menz, Deputy Secretary General and Head of Case Management, German Arbitration Institute (DIS)
Beata Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz, GESSEL
Christian Konrad, Konrad & Partners

11.00: Coffee break 

11.30: Session two: The GAR Live Question time – on case management

With a focus on the developments in cost and efficiency tools, our esteemed panel will discuss questions submitted by the audience and moderator in advance. For example:

  • The case management conference - does it make sense and how useful is it as a tool?
  • What about non-compliance with procedural groundrules as agreed in the CMC – sanctions?
  • What tools, other than the CMC, are available? Are they being used? If not, why not?
  • How useful is the DIS’ new list of case management tools in particular?
  • Summary dismissal - how to do it and when to do it

Moderator:
Daniel Busse, Allen & Overy

Panel:
Nadia Darwazeh, Clyde & Co
Alexander Fessas, Secretary General, ICC Court and Director of ICC Dispute Resolution Services, International Chamber of Commerce
Johanna Wirth, Hengeler Mueller

12.45: Networking lunch

14.00: Session three: Lies, fraud and deceit – what are counsel’s duties in arbitration’s defence?              

Despite much talk and a few initiatives, international arbitration continues to produce accusations of questionable behaviour, even on the part of some well-known names. What more can be done? Or should we all accept the reality that IA is by its nature something of an ethical wasteland? Drawing on their collective experience, our panel will address a selection of ethical issues, such as: 

  • Evidently false testimony and the like – what are counsel’s responsibilities?
  • New developments in ethics – e.g. in Singapore
  • What tools do institutions have on ethical points?
  • Guerrilla tactics – what sanctions are available?
  • Unscrupulous experts and how to deal with them

Panel:
Jan Erik Spangenberg, Manner Spangenberg
Mathias Wittinghofer, Herbert Smith Freehills
Diana Akikol, ABR Avocats

15.15: Coffee break

15.45: Session four: The GAR Live Inquisition on the future of IA in Europe: is private justice doomed?

International arbitration is facing more competition – from opt in commercial courts, and other projects around the world. Meanwhile, civil society wants to stop any dispute featuring public money or quasi-public money, being decided “behind closed doors”. What does the future hold? Right now, IA practitioners are spoiled – with case numbers growing and the value at stake only increasing. Will that still be true in 10 years time? How does the international arbitration community ensure it is?

In the style of a US senate committee hearing, this session will see a succession of witnesses being ‘grilled’ by a panel of GAR Live inquisitors on how to ensure the goose that lays the golden egg isn’t killed. Issues the panel are likely to explore include:

  • What challenges do in house counsel face, in particular?
  • Why do clients really choose international arbitration? Is it all down to enforceability, in the end?
  • Are complaints that IA is too unpredictable fair?
  • How much of a threat are attempts to establish English-speaking courts in jurisdictions such as France, the Netherlands and Germany? Or are they in fact not a threat but a chance?
  • How can we defend investor-state arbitration in particular, and how do we prevent spill-over effects to commercial arbitration?

Inquisitors:
Susanne Gropp-Stadler, Head of Litigation, Siemens
Nikolas Hübschen, Senior Vice President General Law & Litigation, Legal & Compliance, Uniper
Jasmin Kaboni-Voit, Senior Legal Counsel, RWE Supply & Trading

Witnesses:
Richard Happ, Luther
Daniel Hochstrasser, Bär & Karrer
Markus Burianski, White & Case

17.00: Chairs' closing remarks

Daniel Busse, Allen & Overy
Stephan Wilske, Gleiss Lutz
Susanne Gropp-Stadler, Head of Litigation, Siemens

Venue

Taunusanlage 11, 60329 Frankfurt am Main

Prices

Private Practitioner
Type Price Until
Super Early €700  4 May 2018
Early €850 1 Jun 2018
Standard €1,000 12 Jun 2018

 

In-house/governmental
Type Price
Standard Complimentary